Levin: Rashida Tlaib’s Radical Anti-Semitism is the Growing Wing of the Democrat Party


by Jordan Schachtel

On his radio show Monday evening, LevinTV host Mark Levin began his program discussing the out-of-control anti-Semitism in the Democratic Party, particularly emerging from within its Islamist ranks.

Levin stated that freshman Democratic Rep. Rashida Tlaib is “a radical, just like [Ilhan] Omar is a radical.”

“You really ought to listen to this, because this is the growing wing of the Democrat Party. It really is. And it is repulsive. It’s unconscionable. And it’s getting worse,” he continued.

Levin played a podcast interview of Tlaib with Yahoo News over the weekend and proceeded to dissect her falsehoods, specifically her lies about the Holocaust and her ancestors’ roles in assisting Nazi Germany.

Watch the short video of Rep. Tlaib’s Bizarre Comment About the Holocaust HERE.

 

Nick Sandmann’s Lawyer Reveals CNN is Next Target for Lawsuit — the Amount is Staggering

John Greim/LightRocket via Getty Images

First, it was the Washington Post. Now, attorneys for Nick Sandmann — the 16-year-old Covington Catholic High School student unfairly targeted by the mainstream media in January — say CNN is the next target for a defamation lawsuit.

What are the details?

In an interview with Mark Levin that will air on Fox News Sunday, lawyer L. Lin Wood characterized CNN’s coverage of the Covington controversy in general, and on Sandmann in particular, as “more vicious in its direct attacks on Nicholas than the Washington Post.”

“Now you say you’ve seen the tape, if you took the time to look at the full context of what happened that day, Nicholas Sandmann did absolutely nothing wrong. He was as I’ve said to others, he was the only adult in the room,” Wood explained. “But you have a situation where CNN couldn’t resist the idea that here’s a guy with a young boy, that make America great again cap on. So they go after him.”

“They were vicious. It was false. CNN will be sued next week and the dollar figure in the CNN case may be higher than it was in the Washington Post,” Wood added.

When asked when the suit will be filed, Wood said Monday, March 11.

“Monday is the present plan,” Wood said. “I’ve got some young smart lawyers that are working hard as we speak. Double checking and listen when we file complaints, we’ve investigated it because we want to get it right. Maybe CNN can learn from that.” Read the rest and watch video at theblaze.com.

Freedom is Never More Than One Generation Away From Extinction

President Reagan said, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.” – From Liberty and Tyranny by Mark Levin.

Gun Bans Allow Government to Dominate It’s Citizens

“Whether you own a gun, or ever will own a gun, or if you’re afraid of guns, you need to understand how important the Second Amendment is.”

The Second Amendment is not about hunting. It’s about keeping people free. It protects citizens against a tyrannical government. Who’d a thunk it?

Getty Images

From Breitbart.com:

Venezuelans Lament Gun Ban: Allows Government. to Dominate Them.

Venezuelans from all walks of life lament their nation’s six-year-old gun ban and say the prohibition against being armed allows their government to dominate them.

Fox News reports that the gun ban was passed in 2012, at which time “there were only around eight gun stores in the entire country.” Now, remaining stores that once sold guns are in the business of selling fishing tackle.

The ban was passed under Hugo Chavez and then bolstered with $47 million for enforcement under Nicolas Maduro. The penalty for “illicit carrying or selling a weapon now is 20 years behind bars.”

Javier Vanegas, a Venezuelan English teacher now in Ecuador, said, “Guns would have served as a vital pillar to remaining a free people, or at least able to put up a fight. The government security forces, at the beginning of this debacle, knew they had no real opposition to their force. Once things were this bad, it was a clear declaration of war against an unarmed population.”

Vanegas added:

Venezuelans didn’t care enough about it. The idea of having the means to protect your home was seen as only needed out in the fields. People never would have believed they needed to defend themselves against the government. Venezuelans evolved to always hope that our government would be non-tyrannical, non-violator of human rights, and would always have a good enough control of criminality.

Read the rest of this article at breitbart.com.

Levin: Paul Ryan Was Dead Wrong on Birthright Citizenship. Here’s How

Win McNamee | Getty Images

by: Carmel Kookogey

Tuesday on the radio, LevinTV host Mark Levin ripped Speaker of the House Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., for his response to President Trump’s statement that he plans to issue an executive order to end birthright citizenship.

Ryan claimed the 14th Amendment creates the birthright citizenship and that therefore such an executive order would be unconstitutional.

“There’s been no law passed that conveys birthright citizenship onto illegal aliens. There’s been no Supreme Court decision that definitively confers birthright citizenship onto illegal alien children. Nobody’s a hundred percent certain how this came to be. But everybody seems to be a hundred percent certain that the president can’t fix it. … Well, does the Constitution confer birthright citizenship on the children of illegal aliens? Of course it doesn’t!”

Listen:

Levin replayed a clip from his show in 2015, in which he laid out the stated purpose of the 14th Amendment and read Senator Jacob Howard’s explanation.

“‘This will not of course include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens … but will include every other class of persons. It settles the great question of citizenship.’ … Is it not plain English? Is he not as clear as can be that it does not include aliens, it does not include foreigners. … The republican basis for citizenship is consent! Consent of the country! You can’t self-immigrate. You can’t claim jurisdiction because you happen to walk into the United States.” Read the rest of this article at conservativereview.com.

Suprene Court: Mark Levin Tells Republicans to Get on With the Vote

On Sunday’s ‘Life, Liberty & Levin, Mark Levin lays out the real reason the Democrats are destroying Judge Brett Kavanaugh, and in this short clip from the end of the program, he challenges weak Republicans to step up to the plate, stand up and vote.


Watch the full program below:

Mark Levin’s Blistering Rebuke of Democrats Kavanaugh Attack

OMG: You MUST Listen to THIS one.

Constitutional expert Mark Levin lays out what is really going on with the blocking of the Kavanaugh nomination.

On his radio program Wednesday evening, CRTV host Mark Levin issued a blistering rebuke to the progressive Democrats responsible for smearing Judge Brett Kavanaugh these past few days.

“What you see here, ladies and gentlemen, is a battle between those who support the Constitution and those who don’t,” Levin said. “Those who support constitutionalism and those who support progressivism.”

“Progressives are not compassionate; progressives don’t have big hearts,” Levin continued. “They use people. In the name of people, they destroy people. In the name of the public, they destroy society. They are power-hungry. They are control freaks. They are authoritarians, and you’re seeing it all over TV and all over Congress.”

ConservativeReview.com.

‘Life, Liberty & Levin’: How the Mueller Probe is ‘Illegitimate’ and a ‘Smokescreen’

Mark Levin, Dan Bongino, and Joseph diGenova dissect the Mueller Russia investigation.

.
by Chris Pandolfo


On Sunday evening, LevinTV host Mark Levin interviewed former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino and former U.S. attorney Joseph diGenova on his weekly Fox News program, “Life, Liberty & Levin.”

“We’re here on very serious business,” Levin began. He asked his guests about two Department of Justice memoranda, one from the Nixon administration and one from the Clinton administration, that conclude that a president of the United States cannot be indicted by a special counsel.

“I don’t think there’s any question that the Mueller investigation as it sits now is illegitimate,” diGenova said. He explained that the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein did not name a crime for Mueller to investigate, raising serious problems. “It named nothing. This was a way for the department under Rosenstein to avoid responsibility for conducting an inquiry,” he said. Continue reading at conservativereview.com.

Mark Levin on FISA Memo Revelations: ‘Hillary Clinton Paid for a Warrant — That’s the Easiest Way to Put It’

 

Monday on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” conservative talker Mark Levin laid out his case arguing the release of a FISA memo by the House Intelligence Committee last week raised questions about the previous administration. That included some of those holdovers involved in the day-to-day operations of the Department of Justice, including Rod Rosenstein and Robert Mueller.

Levin argued those were the questions that should be asked and summed up the circumstances as 2016 Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton having “paid for a warrant.”

Partial transcript as follows:

This is bad. Let me tell you a couple of things here. Now we know why [Adam] Schiff and the rest of them are fighting so hard. Now we know why the left-wing praetorian guard Democrat media are fighting so hard, trashing [Devin] Nunes, me, you, and others. Let’s walk through this quickly. Who are they trying to protect? Hillary Clinton. Sean, who else are they trying to protect? Barack Obama. His name never comes up.

So, let me help everybody with this. Loretta Lynch knew about these FISA warrants. [Sally] Yates, the deputy attorney general, the extensions Rod Rosenstein, now the deputy attorney general. He knew. FBI Director [James] Comey, Deputy Director [Andrew] McCabe, [Peter] Strzok, the head of counterintelligence, [Lisa] Page — his girlfriend.

Who else would know these FISA applications and warrants? Let me tell you a little secret. These are counterintelligence efforts. You have to assume the National Security Council and the White House knew. Why would the FBI, Justice Department, keep that from the National Security Director in the White House? Why would they keep it from the deputy director in the White House?

Continue reading at breitbart.com.

 

Mark Levin: Mueller Is No Longer Investigating Collusion

 

Monday night, on the Sean Hannity show, conservative radio host, constitutional scholar and former Justice Department official Mark Levin opined that special prosecutor Robert Mueller is no longer investigating collusion, but “everything else.”

They also discussed Levin’s upcoming Sunday night program, Life, Liberty and Levin, which will be debuting next month on Fox News.

View moreLoading ...