Obama Clinton Coup Attempt: Decimating the “Peaceful Transition of Power”


by L.J. Keith

WASHINGTON, DC: The attempted coup staged by Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton against Donald Trump has completely destroyed the notion of the “peaceful transition of power” in America.

Never before in the history of the Republic has an outgoing President attempted to sabotage and undermine his successor. Until Barack Obama.

The very fabric of the United States demands that the integrity of our elections be respected. No two-term President has ever sought to destroy the Presidency of his successor by maliciously undermining them both before and after he was elected.

The peaceful transition of power was an integral part of American Democracy. Not anymore, apparently.

A conspiracy to destroy Trump

But Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton have both damaged the United States in ways the Russians couldn’t even hope to.  They have openly assaulted the integrity of our elections. Weaponized the intelligence agencies, the DOJ and the FBI against political opponents. Actively conspired to overthrow the President. Set in motion a series of corrupt activities and cataclysmic events that have eviscerated the character of America for the last three years.

In the process, Obama is the destroyer of the very notion of the peaceful transition of power. His criminal activities to undermine the Trump Presidency amount to sedition, abuse of power, abrogation of civil rights, waging an effective coup d’etat against the constitution and amount to treason.

Hillary Clinton continues, two years after she lost, to insist that the election was “stolen from her”. Obama Vice President Joe Biden agreed with a New Hampshire voter who declared Trump an ‘illegitimate President”.  Hillary Clinton invented the Russian Dossier that John Brennan and James Comey inflicted on the body politic. Joe Biden was part and parcel of the Obama administrations dirty tricks, criminal spying, and overt corruption.

A reckoning is coming: Barr appoints US Attorney John Durham

Read the rest HERE.

 

The Rats Are Starting to Jump Ship

Deep State Blame Game: Comey, Clapper, Brennan Spar over Who Pushed ‘Pee’ Dossier as Credible Intel – Round 1: Comey Made Paper Trail Pointing to Brennan

Riccardo Savi/Sipa/AP

by Aaron Klein

Disgraced ex-FBI Director James Comey, former CIA Director turned anti-Trump activist John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence and Trump critic James Clapper are the subjects of a dispute over which top Obama administration officials advocated for the infamous Steele dossier to be utilized as evidence in the Russia collusion investigation.

The argument erupted into the open with a Brennan surrogate being quoted in the news media opposing Comey not long after Attorney General William Barr appointed a U.S. attorney to investigate the origins of the Russia collusion claims.

The fiasco was kicked into high gear after Fox News cited “sources familiar with the records” pointing to an email chain from late-2016 showing Comey allegedly telling FBI employees that it was Brennan who insisted that the anti-Trump dossier be included in a January 6, 2017 U.S. Intelligence Community report, known as the ICA, assessing Russian interference efforts.

A former CIA official, clearly defending Brennan, shot back at the assertion, instead claiming that it was Brennan and Clapper who opposed a purported push by Comey to include the dossier charges in the ICA. Read the rest of this article HERE.

 

Judge Jeanine is Back


by Jeff Poor
Saturday during the “Opening Statement” segment of her Fox News Channel program, Jeanine Pirro argued it was time for those that brought on the calls for an investigation into alleged collusion between the 2016 Trump presidential campaign and the Russian government should be held to account.

Pirro named former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former FBI Director James Comey, former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and former FBI agent Peter Strzok as those that should face scrutiny for setting up a special counsel probe that Pirro likened to a coup. Read more HERE.

An Epidemic of Erasures, Redactions, Omissions, and Perjuries

by Victor Davis Hanson:

Imagine the following: The IRS sends you, John Q. Citizen, a letter alleging you have not complied with U.S. tax law. In the next paragraph, the tax agency then informs you that it needs a series of personal and business documents. Indeed, it will be sending agents out to discuss your dilemma and collect the necessary records.

But when the IRS agents arrive, you explain to them that you cannot find about 50 percent of the documents requested, and have no idea whether they even exist. You sigh that both hard copies of pertinent information have unfortunately disappeared and hard drives were mysteriously lost.

You nonchalantly add that you smashed your phone, tablet, and computer with a hammer. You volunteer that, of those documents you do have, you had to cut out, blacken or render unreadable about 30 percent of the contents. After all, you have judged that the redacted material either pertains to superfluous and personal matters such as weddings and yoga, or is of such a sensitive nature that its release would endanger your company or business or perhaps even the country at large.

You also keep silent that you have a number of pertinent documents locked up in a safe hidden in your attic unknown to the IRS. Let them find it, you muse. And when the agents question your unilateral decisions over hours of interrogatories, you remark to them on 245 occasions that you have no memory of your acts—or you simply do not have an answer for them.

In some instances, you state things that are not true, cannot be true by any stretch of the imagination, and contradict things you have said in the past—and you make it clear that you don’t think much of such inconsistencies. When pressed with contradictory evidence, you nonchalantly reply that you gave the “least untruthful” answer.

What would happen to you, a typical American citizen, should you follow this current Washington model of erasing, redacting, omitting, forgetting, and lying? Read the rest of this article at americangreatness.com.

House Releases Transcript Of Comey’s Closed-Door Interview; “I Don’t Remember Used 71 Times”

Saturday afternoon, the House Judiciary Committee published and released a full transcript of former FBI Director James Comey’s Closed door testimony.

According to Fox News, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Bob Goodlatte, R-Va., and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy, R-SC, published the 235-page transcript as a part of an agreement with Comey.

At first the Former FBI Director challenged the subpoena to appear before the committee and instead pushed for a public hearing.

Lawmakers were frustrated with Comey’s lack of specifics.  A statement issued by Chairman Gowdy’s Office indicated Comey answered “I don’t remember” 71 times, “I don’t know” 166 times and “I don’t recall” eight times. Read the rest of this article at ilovemyfreedom.org.

Click on the image below to download the full transcript of James Comey’s testimony.

 

President Trump Shares Image of Political Opponents Behind Bars


On Wednesday morning, President Trump shared an image on his Twitter account containing several of his political opponents behind bars and questioning why they are not under investigation for “treason.”

The image, which was retweeted from a pro-Trump Twitter account, depicts many of those he has criticized in the past. Among those included were former President Barack Obama, 2016 presidential nominee Hillary Clinton, special counsel Robert Mueller, former Attorney General Loretta Lynch, former President Bill Clinton, and former FBI Director James Comey. Read the rest of this article at breitbart.com.

Judge Jeanine – The Deep State Hard at Work

On Saturday’s Justice With Judge Jeanine, Judge Pirro talks about her disappointment with the just released Inspector General’s report on the actions (and the inactions) of the Department of Justice. Here is the full video and a partial transcript of her opening statement:


Partial transcript: I’m a believer. I believe in the system, and I believe in justice. I dedicated more than 30 years
to the criminal justice system and the assignment of blame.

Tonight I’m not angry. I’m just dumbfounded, disheartened and disappointed. Over the long awaited, often delayed Inspector General’s report on the actions of the Department of Justice and the FBI, in the handling of the Hillary Clinton email Investigation. The report’s conclusion, 568 Pages later, FBI director James Comey was insubordinate. There were a few mistakes and errors in judgment. And although there was some bias, there was no evidence of bias in the handling of the email investigation. This report mimics Comey’s conclusions in the email case itself. Both the Inspector General and Comey make out a provable case, and then conclude there IS no case.

Nothing changes. The Deep State hard at work. I don’t know about you, but I’m so tired of lessons learned. They say Comey deviated from the rules. Deviated from the rules? Comey and his FBI cabal fixed a case. Hillary not indicted for her crimes, yet an effort to frame Donald trump for no crime. And no bias in the conclusion? Because someone said yes, I was biased, or said simply “I am not biased?” That’s it? Every day in this country murder cases are tried where there is no admission of guilt, and only denials. And yet jurors decide the accused’s intentions based on what they say, what they do what they don’t do. Determining something one’s intent is not that difficult. Intent can be determined like this: Take a look at these texts. “We’ll stop him from being president.” “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event you die when you are 40.” “Hillary should win 100 million o zero.” “America will get what the public deserves.” And let’s add a new one folks, from an FBI lawyer.” Vive la resistance. Gee, isn’t that Obama and Hillary’s mantra?

You don’t have to be a rocket scientist to understand those statements. They not only indicate a biased, hateful state of mind, they imply unequivocally, a willingness to take official action to impact the election. How do you pledge resistance against the president while you are investigating him? And the Inspector General says there’s no evidence of improper consideration impacting the investigation.

Comey didn’t just deviate from well established practices, he didn’t even do an investigation. He covered for it, by having the same people handle the Hillary case and the Trump frame-up. Folks, it doesn’t happen that way. This case is not about mistakes or errors in judgment. It’s about a Deep State trying to drag a truck across the presidential finish line and trying to destroy the man Americans wanted in the Oval Office.

James Comey Confronted by Laura Loomer on First Day of Book Tour

 

On the first day of disgraced former FBI DirectorJames Comey’s “A Higher Loyalty” book tour at Barnes and Noble in New York City, Conservative journalist Laura Loomer DESTROYED Comey with a list of questions about some of the former FBI Director’s unethical behavior.

When asked whether or not it was “ethical leadership” to brief President Donald Trump about the unverifiable and salacious Steele dossier that was funded by Hillary Clinton and her associates, Comey was dumbfounded and Loomer was promptly shouted down by the audience and escorted out by security.

Twitter: https://twitter.com/LauraLoomer

Judge Jeanine Pirro Blasts ‘Pompous, Egotistical, Patronizing Liar’ Jim Comey


.
.
On Saturday’s Justice With Judge Jeanine, Judge Pirro talks about former FBI director’s new book, and more importantly, the man himself:

Now why would you believe a guy with a history replete with lies dishonesty and contradictions? We’ll find out Tuesday when disgraced former FBI director James Comey’s book, A higher Loyalty, Truth, Lies and Leadership, hits the stands.

Truth, lies and leadership? Really? Talk about an oxymoron. Jim you’re the ultimate liar. You lied on multiple occasions to multiple people including Congress under oath and that’s a crime. Truth? You refused to follow the law causing both Republicans and Democrats to call for your head. And leadership? You violated the rules of your own agency by leaking classified information to a friend to leak to the New York Times. You went along with Loretta Lynch’s false narrative, that Hilary’s case was a matter, not an investigation. And folks, get ready for a knife fight between Jim Comey and Loretta Lynch on both that as well as that tarmac charade.

Jim you’ve repeatedly proven your inability to run the FBI in a non-political way. You’ve stayed silent as the New York Times retracted the story that Hillary’s FBI review was a security referral and not a criminal referral as if the FBI is a security company installing locks and peephole’s. You say the President is unethical, while you turned a well-respected agency into a haven of organized criminal conspirators at the top echelon. Your book, Jim isn’t about leadership, it’s about butt-kissing, like when you were struck by the way Barack Obama could see and evaluate a variety of angles and complicated issues, his insight and ability to connect with an audience. Yeah, right Jim. Barack’s really bright. Like when he bragged about traveling to all 57 states. the guy’s running for president and he thinks there were 57 states…

…You’re a pompous, egotistical, patronizing, condescending, holier-than-thou political operative trying to redeem your reputation and cash in on lies, which is the opposite of truth and leadership your book is about. A higher loyalty to none other than you, yourself. And that’s my open

Hillary Clinton & James Comey – What Difference Does It Make?


Hillary Clinton’s use of a personal email server while serving as Secretary of State is not only an enduring political scandal, it’s also a new hit song. Performed by Hillary Clinton and FBI Director James Comey, this soulful tune tells the story of one woman and her ability to transcend the traditional confines of U.S. law. Continue reading at socialistmop.com.

View moreLoading ...