LEAKED VIDEO: Google Leadership’s Dismayed Reaction to Trump Election

.

.

A video recorded by Google shortly after the 2016 presidential election reveals an atmosphere of panic and dismay amongst the tech giant’s leadership, coupled with a determination to thwart both the Trump agenda and the broader populist movement emerging around the globe.

The video is a full recording of Google’s first all-hands meeting following the 2016 election (these weekly meetings are known inside the company as “TGIF” or “Thank God It’s Friday” meetings). Sent to Breitbart News by an anonymous source, it features co-founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin, VPs Kent Walker and Eileen Naughton, CFO Ruth Porat, and CEO Sundar Pichai. It can be watched in full above. It can and should be watched in full above in order to get the full context of the meeting and the statements made.

It was reported earlier this week that Google tried to boost turnout among the Latino population to help Hillary Clinton, only to be dismayed as the usually solid Democratic voting bloc switched to the GOP in record numbers. This video shows a similar level of dismay among Google’s most high-profile figures.

These individuals, who preside over a company with unrivaled influence over the flow of information, can be seen disparaging the motivations of Trump voters and plotting ways to use their vast resources to thwart the Trump agenda.

Co-founder Sergey Brin can be heard comparing Trump supporters to fascists and extremists. Brin argues that like other extremists, Trump voters were motivated by “boredom,” which he says in the past led to fascism and communism.

The Google co-founder then asks his company to consider what it can do to ensure a “better quality of governance and decision-making.” Read the rest of this article at breitbart.com.

 

Google Is Trump’s Most Dangerous Enemy

Getty: Leon Neal, Ramin Talaie, Mandel Ngan/AFP

by Allum Bokhari

After criticizing social media platforms for mass-censoring conservatives and the alternative media earlier this month, President Trump has turned his attention to Google. Not a moment too soon — of all the politically biased tech giants, Google is by far the most dangerous.

Trump’s critical comments about Google referenced statistics from a report in PJ Media which found that a staggering 96 percent of search results for “Trump” return results from news sites that are hostile to the President. Breitbart News’ own investigation found the same result.

As Google search results are personalized, this wasn’t a strictly scientific study — that would require tests on hundreds, if not thousands of Google users. But the fact that a conservative columnist received search results that were 96 percent liberal should be deeply worrying. If that’s what a conservative with a (presumably) conservative search history sees, what kind of results are being sent to swing-voters? Read the rest of this article at breitbart.com.

 

Barack Obama in 2008: Both Parties ‘Have Monkeyed Around With Elections’

A huge “Bru Ha Ha” here, but not even a whimper when The Almighty Barack Obama said this in 2008. A double standard ya’ think?


by Robert Kraychick

Barack Obama warned supporters that politicians had “monkeyed around” with elections, during a campaign speech at Kent State University in New Philadelphia, Ohio, on September 3, 2008.

Then-Senator Obama (D-IL) said (0:29 in the video below): “I come from Chicago. It’s not as if it’s just Republicans who have monkeyed around with elections in the past. Sometimes Democrats have, too. You know, whenever people are in power, they have this tendency to try to tilt things in their direction.”

 

Obama called for establishing a “voting rights division” within the Department of Justice (DOJ) to combat “voter fraud” and what he said were efforts to “discourage people to vote.”

On Wednesday, Florida Republican gubernatorial nominee Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-FL) advised Floridians not to monkey this up” by selecting a “socialist agenda” via a Democrat governor.

News media outlets such as The Hill and CNN framed the comment as racial, given that DeSantis’s Democrat opponent, Andrew Gillum, is black. Read the rest of this article at breitbart.com.

Andrew Cuomo Backpedals and Brennan Didn’t Mean It

Brennan: I Didn’t Mean That Trump Committed Treason
New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo: America Has Always Been Great’

Ari Fleischer Leaves the Media Red-Faced and Sobbing With Rage

Note: This 200 newspaper media editorial attack on President Donald Trump, engineered by the left wing Boston Globe, is scheduled for today, August 16th.

Former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer laughs as he participates in “The President and the Press: The First Amendment in the First 100 Days” forum, at the Newseum in Washington, Wednesday, April 12, 2017, during . (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

August 15, 2018 by streiff

Tomorrow, some 200 newspapers are going to run editorials TOTALLY CONDEMNING President Trump’s treating the national media much like a rented mule.

Participating dailies include the Houston Chronicle, the Minneapolis Star Tribune, the Miami Herald and the Denver Post, as well as the Globe. Joining the movement are the American Society of News Editors and the New England Newspaper and Press Association. Dan Rather is on board, as is the Radio Television Digital News Association.

“Our words will differ. But at least we can agree that such attacks are alarming,” Pritchard’s appeal declared.

This is just the kind of mutual masturbation that we’ve come to expect and adore about the press. At no point are they going to own up to the thinly and poorly sourced stories that they have run on Trump and his family and his administration. They aren’t going to take responsibility for total lies peddled to discredit Trump and the men and women who serve in senior positions in his cabinet (for example). They aren’t going to agree to bullwhip Jim Acosta from the White House briefing room. They aren’t going to concede that having Dan Rather join this project makes it somewhat farcical. And it isn’t going to change any minds. If you really believe the media is trying to get the story straight, you and your leprechaun can sip your lattes while you nod your head. If you believe, like a majority of the country, that the press is inherently dishonest and biased against the administration, then you’re going to ignore it. (I probably won’t because CNN’s contribution is bound to offer up some comedy gold.)

This was Bush43 press secretary Ari Fleischer’s take on it.


Read the rest of this article at redstate.com.

128 Establishment News Outlets Coordinate Attack on Trump

AP/Andrew Harnik

by John Nolte:

Some 128 establishment news outlets are coordinating an attack against President Trump that is scheduled to launch on August 16.

While the media have undoubtedly been coordinating against Trump ever since he announced his candidacy (after all, there is a reason every news outlet reports on the exact same stories using the exact same left-wing narrative), this is the first time I am aware of where the media have openly and proudly coordinated to attack Trump.

This coming attack is premised on the entitled belief within the establishment media that the First Amendment protects the media from criticism, and that the First Amendment restricts a sitting president from criticizing the media.

How else to explain 128 (and counting) news outlets coordinating to attack the president for daring to criticize the media for launching coordinated attacks against him.

The event is being organized by the far-left Boston Globe.

Basically, on August 16, some 128 strongly worded op-eds will run to mislead readers into believing criticism of the media is “unacceptable” and an “attack on the First Amendment.” Read the rest of this article at breitbart.com.

 

Why We Don’t Trust the Press

h/t: bispacreview

Pollak: The Attack on Alex Jones Is An Attack on Free Speech

We YOU need your help. This is a frontal assault on our YOUR free speech.

InfoWars/YouTube, Josh Edelson/AFP/Getty, Justin Sullivan/Getty

by Joel B. Pollak:

Internet provocateur and InfoWars proprietor Alex Jones is being systematically excluded from social media platforms. This is, plainly, an attack on free speech.

Over the weekend, Facebook removed several Alex Jones-related pages, and Apple deleted many of his podcasts. On Monday, YouTube followed suit by deleting his video channel. Pinterest closed its InfoWars page. Twitter may soon do the same.

The timing is no coincidence: all of these outlets are responding to a campaign by left-wing activists who are determined to shut down conservative voices — including Breitbart.

It is a shameful effort — which is why some of those responsible for the boycotts have tried to maintain their anonymity.

Today, they are circulating “copy/paste” talking points that argue they are not abusing freedom of speech or the press by pushing companies to ban Jones, because “free speech protects you from your government.” Jones is being censored by private companies, not the government. He has no right, after all, to force anyone to carry his content.

It is true that the First Amendment is not implicated by private censorship, but free speech certainly is damaged by it.

From the point of view of the person being silenced, it makes absolutely no difference whether the censor is a policeman or a mob. And freedom of speech is a social value, a characteristic of an open and democratic society that has exists quite independently of the government. It is — or ought to be — sustained by civil society, even and especially when the views expressed are objectionable. Read the rest of this article HERE.

Related article: ‘We the People Should Decide Whether’ Google, Facebook Can Censor.

 

View moreLoading ...