Colin Kaepernick Donated $25,000 to a Group Named in Honor of Cop-Killer Assata Shakur

By Timothy Meads

Former San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick recently donated $25,000 to a black queer feminist group named after FBI fugitive and convicted cop-killer Assata Shakur, reports the Daily Mail.

In 1973, Assata Shakur shot and killed New Jersey state trooper Werner Forester during a traffic stop.  Shakur was subsequently arrested and given a life in prison jail sentence, but in 1979 she escaped. Members of the Black Liberation Army, a radical offspring of the Black Panther Party, staged her get away by taking prison guards hostage at gunpoint.

She then fled to communist Cuba where she is living under political asylum, according to reports. Shakur is on the FBI’s most wanted list and is considered armed and dangerous.

Colin Kaepernick made the $25,000 donation to the group named in honor of the cop-killer, “Assata’s Daughters,”  as part of his goal to provide $100,000 to underprivileged communities. He designated $2,500 specifically for “Cop Watch,” a program that trains volunteers to follow and videotape police officers.

In 2016, Colin Kaepernick sparked a national protest that is supposedly against police brutality by kneeling during the national anthem. Read the rest of this article at townhall.com.

Yahoo Sportswriter Shames Black NHL Star Who Refuses to Protest National Anthem

AP Photo/Michael Dwyer

By John Nolte

Whether it is gay marriage, transgenderism, health care, or the these appalling national anthem protests, phase one of the left’s fascist propaganda campaign always begins in this way… Hey, just let us do our thing. We are not bothering you. No one is hurting you. We are just expressing ourselves. What do you care? Let us live our lives.

Nope, before you know it, the whole idea of live and let live is no longer good enough for the left; before you know it, these worms turn and all of a sudden we are being put out of business for not participating in gay marriages, our daughters are forced to pee next to mentally ill men wearing a skirt, the government is mandating us to buy overpriced health insurance, and sportswriters are shaming and bullying black athletes who refuse to disrespect the American flag.

Yes, that is now happening.

Over at Yahoo, Greg Wyshynski is a sportswriter who covers hockey, and someone who only sees racial bogeymen behind those of us disgusted with crybaby, millionaire athletes openly disrespecting the American flag.

Wyshynski is also someone who is everything he falsely accuses Trump of being—a white guy who believes black people should only behave in certain ways. Read the rest of this article at breitbart.com.

The Swamp Just Bounced Trump Into A European-Style Assault on Free Speech

Photo by Creative Creative Touch Imaging Ltd./NurPhoto via Getty Images

by Raheem Kassam

Many Americans don’t seem to appreciate as much as outside admirers do, that the United States is the only country in the world with a commitment to free speech enshrined in the nation’s Constitution. Many nations do not even have codified constitution of which to speak.

Which is why it is almost more egregious to the outsider than the American that such protections are under assault, not just on the streets of Berkeley or Charlottesville, but in your legislature — and soon in your Oval Office.

This afternoon, White House Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders confirmed President Trump would “absolutely” be signing a resolution drafted by Republican and Democrat lawmakers “condemning” hatred.

“He and [Senator Tim Scott] talked about that and discussed that and agreed that that was the appropriate place to be,” Sanders said. “In terms of whether or not he’ll sign the joint resolution, absolutely, and he looks forward to doing so as soon as he receives it.”

But the resolution is manifestly a ruse — the first line of attack in a new wave of assaults against free speech in America.

Let’s examine what the motion, passed by both legislative chambers early this week, says. Read the rest of the article here

The preamble, in addition to expressing “support for the Charlottesville community,” demands of the President that he rejects “White nationalists, White supremacists, the Ku Klux Klan, neo-Nazis, and other hate groups” and urges him and his cabinet to “use all available resources to address the threats posed by those groups”.

From the outset this is disingenuous and troublesome.

The President has already disavowed these groups, including Neo Nazis and the KKK. Why are elected members, alongside the White House, wasting time virtue signaling over it?

Perhaps because it backs POTUS into a corner, especially when you consider many establishment media organizations call his former Chief Strategist Stephen K. Bannon — who has mocked and derided ethno-nationalists — a “white nationalist” or “white supremacist”. This week, ESPN even let one of its hosts off with no more than a slapped wrist for suggesting the President himself was a “white supremacist”.

So by whose definitions are we going? And what exactly does “use all available resources” mean?

The President and his cabinet ostensibly have all resources available to them. The U.S. military, trillions of dollars, three and a half years of power. To what is the President subscribing?

Whatever happened to the old line by Voltaire, “Think for yourselves and let others enjoy the privilege to do so too”, or as it was paraphrased by Evelyn Beatrice Hall writing under the pseudonym S.G. Tallentyre in Friends of Voltaire: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”?

Personally, I believe sunlight is the best disinfectant for hateful beliefs. Read the rest of this article HERE.

Click the following link to read the resolution “condemning hatred” [and the First Amendment – ADB]”

As Its Influence Wanes, Increasingly Militant MSM Promotes Violence and Censorship

By John Nolte

Yes, the MSM has admitted they got 2016 exactly wrong and that they are out-of-touch with the average American. What truly terrifies the media about 2016, though, is something that has remained largely unspoken.

It is what Trump’s victory said so clearly about the MSM’s inability to influence public opinion and, by extension, the outcome of elections. What has also remained unspoken is the media’s desperate and dangerous reaction to this waning influence.

As a 25 year media-watcher, I have never seen anything close to the propaganda campaign the national media launched to defeat Donald Trump last year. It was 24/7, it was coordinated across every news outlet, it was all-hands-on-deck. And Trump still won. Which can only mean that the media’s influence has eroded to a point where, despite hurling every kitchen sink available, they suffered a humiliating loss last November.

Before I get into the grit of the nit, it is important to keep in mind that our media is nothing more than the communication branch of the Democrat Party. When you look at everything the media does — the lying, the campaigns of personal destruction, the fake news, the focus on stuff like Melania’s shoes — this explanation is the only one that makes sense. The media is a full-blown leftwing political operation run, for the most part, by former Democrat operatives like Jake Tapper, George Stephanopolous, and Chuck Todd, as well as those related to Democrat operatives.

Knowing that, and knowing the long history of leftwing regimes (Stalin, Hitler, Mao, Chavez, Castro), we know what a leftwing political operation does when its influence begins to diminish. Because their ideas are so unappealing and are proven failures, the left ultimately has no choice but to embrace violence and censorship. This truth is as old as the Bolshevik Revolution, and this is exactly what we are seeing unfold today in our own country. Rather than politicians, though, it is our media that has turned dangerously militant. (Bold type: mine)
a

Rush Limbaugh is absolutely correct, the Democrat party is dead. Chuck Schumer and Nancy Pelosi, the party’s two supposed leaders, are non-entities. From top-to-bottom, the party is a feckless pile of incompetence. Knowing this, the media has told Schumer and Pelosi to hold their beer as they seize the levers of power in the leftwing cause. As a result, the media has used billions of corporate dollars to launch a propaganda campaign to unseat Trump and to keep the divisive issue of identity politics thriving. Continue reading at breitbart.com.

Monuments Madness, Phase II: The Right Begins Self-Censoring

Josh Edelson / Associated Press

By Amanda House

Threats of violence and fears of the label “racist” spur conservatives to self-censor. Local law enforcement officers and conservative organizers continue to shut down or cancel peaceful free speech events after the left labels them “white supremacist” rallies.

The targeting of free speech and America’s past began long before the violence in Charlottesville and long before Donald Trump won the presidency. This has nothing to do with the Confederacy or a resurgence of white supremacists. This is basic iconoclasm, with cultural revolutionaries directing their hatred at a politically-anointed totem.

We’ve seen this trend throughout history: aggressive rejection of the status quo. It’s a common component of major – usually radical – political and cultural change, just like international movements, from China’s cultural revolution in the ’60s and ’70s – which left 1.5 million people dead – to the Taliban’s destruction of centuries-old Buddhist statues and the Islamic State’s ongoing devastation of ancient sites. This iconoclastic sentiment – a groupthink fever spreading relatively unchecked – now infects America. First, the herd goes for the statues. Then comes the book burning. Eventually, we see the targeting of individuals and their freedoms. The tactics are totalitarian, the monuments, simply weapons to attack the First Amendment. Continue reading at breitbart.com.

Ben Shapiro Stormed Congress and Blew the Left’s Argument Against Free Speech to Smithereens

Here’s the key — “You don’t actually have to say anything insulting to microaggress. Somebody merely needs to take offense.” – Ben Shapiro

Ben Shapiro speaking at the 2016 Politicon at the Pasadena Convention Center in Pasadena, California. (Photo by Gage Skidmore

By Tyler O’Neil

On Thursday, Daily Wire Editor-in-Chief Ben Shapiro testified about free speech on college campuses before the U.S. House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. In less than five minutes, he dissected and destroyed the Left’s argument against free speech.

“Free speech is under assault because of a three-step argument made by advocates and justifiers of violence,” Shapiro declared in his opening remarks. “The first step is they say that the validity or invalidity of an argument can be judged solely by the ethnic, sexual, racial, or cultural identity of the person making the argument.”

This “intersectionality” argument — that society structurally oppresses people of ethnic, sexual, racial, or cultural identities and therefore only those who have been oppressed can speak about certain issues — is the ground of the “microaggression” culture stifling speech on campuses, the Daily Wire editor argued.

“The second step is they claim that those who say otherwise are engaged in what they call verbal violence,” Sharipo added. “The final step is that they conclude that physical violence is sometimes justified in order to stop such verbal abuse.”

In order to understand how college campuses shut down speech — often but not always conservative speech — Americans must understand the philosophy of “intersectionality.” Shapiro argued that this philosophy dominates college campuses and “a large segment of today’s Democratic Party.” Continue reading at pjmedia.com.

What’s Worse, Voter Fraud or Trying to Stop it?

The Government Accountability Institute found 8471 instances of double voting in 21 states during the 2016 elections, but Sunday on MSNBC, congresswoman Karen Bass (D-CA) said President Donald Trump’s voter-fraud commission was an “assault on our democracy.”

The above study only considered double voting, but many other types of voter fraud exist including falsifying registration information, destroying ballots and noncitizen voting. So the obvious question is: What is a greater assault on our democracy, voter fraud, or a commission to investigate and help clean up voter fraud?

8471 cases of double voting uncovered during 2016 election.

The Voter Fraud Commission Is an ‘Assault on Our Democracy From the President’

Judge Jeanine and Dr. Sebastian Gorka 07/15/2017

Here’s Judge Jeanine’s compelling opening statement on her Fox News program, Justice with Judge Jeanine on the nonstop Russia hysteria, followed by her segment with Deputy Assistant to President Donald Trump, Dr.Sebastian Gorka. The program aired on July 15th, 2017.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

Kellyanne Conway Takes Down “Fake News” Chris Cuomo on CNN

White House advisor Kellyanne Conway went head-to-head with Chris Cuomo in a fiery thirty five minute shootout on CNN’s “New Day” on Monday (Note to those politically correct snowflakes lacking a sense of humor or a sense of irony: the words fiery and shootout are used metaphorically) .

At one point in the exchange Conway asked Cuomo: “Aren’t you the least bit reluctant, if not embarrassed that you now talk about Russia more than you talk about America? Doesn’t this bother you?”

In the video clip below Fox News host Tucker Carlson played a montage of excerpts from this interview on his show.

 

Watch the the entire interview below (if you can handle it).

Mark Levin to the Media: Want Trump to Act Presidential? Then Have Respect for the Office of the President

By Jeff Poor

Thursday on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” conservative talk show host Mark Levin, author of the book “Rediscovering Americanism: And the Tyranny of Progressivism,” reacted to the controversy created by two tweets from President Donald Trump attacking MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and its co-host Mika Brzezinski.

zzz

zzz

zzz

zzz

zzz

 

 

Read the rest of this article at breitbart.com.

Learn more about Mark’s new book at Rediscovering Americanism: And the Tyranny of Progressivism

View moreLoading ...