“Clinton Cash” – The Movie, Watch it Here, Watch it Now

Here is the complete movie version of Peter Schweizer’s best selling book, Clinton Cash which has already had over 1.1 million views online. Please note that the video begins with Stephen K. Bannon, Executive Chairman of Breitbart News and the screenwriter of the film, interviewing the author, Peter Schweitzer. The interview is 14:55 long and is immediately followed by the film.

z
z
Breitbart News is honored to present free of charge the Director’s Cut of Clinton Cash — the new documentary taking the internet by storm, based on Peter Schweizer’s bestselling book (now available in paperback) and graphic novel of the same name.

Due to the overwhelming success of last weekend’s premiere of Clinton Cash, the film has been the #1 trending topic on Facebook for three days in a row. Its success in dominating social media during the Democratic National Convention is thanks in part to the signal boost given by progressive supporters of Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders.

Already concerned citizens have circulated copies of the film on various media platforms. While most filmmakers would find the pirating of their material troubling, the Clinton Cash filmmakers have a message to the world: “Pirate away!”

Unlike Bill and Hillary Clinton, we believe some things are more important than cold cash. This film was not made to make money. It was made to alert the public to the appalling — and dangerous — corruption of the Clintons.

Continue reading at breitbart.com.

Comey’s FBI Helped Convict Navy Reservist who “Handled Classified Materials Inappropriately”

From Tom Fitton’s Judicial Watch:

FBI Chief James Comey Grilled About Decision Not to Charge Hillary Clinton

FBI Chief James Comey Grilled About Decision Not to Charge Hillary Clinton

Illustrating that FBI Director James Comey is a liar and a fraud, his agency helped convict a Navy reservist last summer of the same crime that he just cleared Hillary Clinton of committing. In that case the reservist from northern California got criminally charged—as per FBI recommendation—for having classified material on personal electronic devices that weren’t authorized by the government to contain such information. The FBI investigation didn’t reveal evidence that the reservist intended to distribute classified information to unauthorized personnel, so he was just being “extremely careless” like Clinton and her top aides.

Similar offenses, vastly different outcome. The key factor, of course, is that one subject is a regular Joe without Clinton-like political connections. His name is Bryan H. Nishimura and last July he pleaded guilty to unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials after the FBI found such materials were copied and stored in at least one “unauthorized and unclassified system.” Clinton had droves of classified and top secret materials in an “unauthorized and unclassified system.” Nishimura had been deployed to Afghanistan as a regional engineer for the U.S. military and had access to classified briefings and digital records that could only be retained and viewed on authorized government computers, according to the FBI announcement, which defines the reservist’s crime in the following manner; “handled classified materials inappropriately.” So did Clinton on a much larger scale. Continue reading at judicialwatch.org.

Opening Statement, July 9th, 2016

On Saturday’s Justice With Judge Jeanine, Judge Pirro Weighs in on the Dallas massacre of police officers, the president’s racist response and anarchy. Here is the full video and the complete transcript of her opening statement:

Americans got over the racial divide when we elected a black president not only once but twice. Americans overwhelmingly voted for the man blind to his color. His color made no difference to American voters. Long past the issue of race, voters long past the Civil War, long passed the civil rights era focused more on the content of the character than the color of the skin.

But this week’s shooting of 12 police officers and two civilians in Dallas is a reflection of a new deep division created by that very man. The shooting in Dallas was not just about racism; make no mistake that dirt bag shooter, who will remain nameless in this open, was a racist, an African-American, he wanted to kill only white people, especially white officers. And the shooting in Dallas wasn’t just about police brutality. I got news for you folks, police brutality is colorblind. It crosses all racial and ethnic lines. I know I prosecuted them and it wasn’t just about someone mentally ill. I’ve always found that stigma too easy an excuse for evil. And it wasn’t about guns either.

Dallas was about anarchy. It was about lawlessness, it was about rhetoric, the rhetoric that too easily inflames those who feel wronged, rhetoric that does nothing but repeatedly stoke the flames and scars of old wounds resolved long ago. At a time when Americans were both experiencing and fearing the reality of a Muslim jihad against us, our president, at a Prayer Breakfast no less, attempts to reconcile or explain murders in the name of Allah with this:

Video clip of Obama: “Unless we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place. Remember that during the Crusades, the Inquisition, people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ.” End clip of Obama.

And after the shooting of 12 police officers, he seeks to again remind us, not of the situation of the twelve officers shot, the shooting and the injured and the trauma that surrounded it, but instead talks of the deaths of two African-Americans. A follow up that seems like another get off your high horse folks, it’s your turn.

Video clip of Obama: “Americans of all races in all backgrounds are also rightly saddened and angered, about the deaths of Alton Sterling and Philando Castile, and about the larger persistent problem of African-Americans and Latinos being treated differently in our criminal justice system.” End clip of Obama.

The problems of African-Americans and Latinos being treated differently in our criminal justice system. Every chance he gets he stokes the flame. Example: Trayvon Martin, followed by a not guilty verdict. And Ferguson’s Michael Brown, a thug who tried to grab a cop’s gun and got himself shot. There wasn’t even a grand jury indictment and not even federal charges against the police officer. But Ferguson was about anarchy, and anyone with a functioning brain would have to assume that for Michael Brown to grab a cop’s gun, suggests it wasn’t his first encounter with the law. Who told Brown that he and not the law should be in control? Yet the Department of Justice, and the Attorney General and high-end government officials all rushed to Ferguson, to his funeral as well.

And Baltimore, another training ground for anarchists, a perceived wrong, the response based on rhetoric of racial injustice and hate. That should be a violent protest? The response should be the burning of businesses many owned by African-Americans? And a DA who outrageously runs to a microphone and announces an indictment of six cops saying she hears the calls of a lawless mob? And again all the police painted as racists, yet no convictions. And it was an African-American judge made the calls. And in New York the chant: “What do we want? Dead cops. When do we want them? Now.” And then two cops innocently eating lunch in their squad car assassinated not long after. When we have leaders who vehemently support the First Amendment language and protest the call for the deaths of those who wear the badge, but then caution the rest of us not to say something that would offend another’s religion.

Video clip of Obama: “And if in fact we defend the legal right of a person to insult another’s religion, we’re equally obligated to use our free speech to condemn such insults, and stand shoulder to shoulder with religious communities, particularly religious minorities who are targets of such attacks.” End clip of Obama.

And our president upon hearing of the assassination of five police officers, all white, and the shooting of another seven officers, wants to talk about a white kid walking into a black church shooting. Why Mr. President, are you even bringing this up? It’s the same thing you did at the prayer breakfast. After an American has his head cut off, you want to talk about the Crusades. It’s as if it’s your turn. Mr. President you have done nothing but tell us we deserve it. You have done nothing but look back in the rearview mirror, but when i look at Dallas, all I saw were whites and blacks running away from anarchy. All I saw were whites and blacks picking each other up. That’s the America I see and no one is going to change my mind. And no one, not even you Mr. President is going to do that.

And that’s my open. Tell me what you think on Facebook or Twitter, hashtag JudgeJeanine.

How Hillary Clinton Botched the Response to Dallas Murders

hillary-frown-glare-AP-640x480By Joel E. Pollak

Donald Trump was supposed to be the racist. Yet his response to the murders of five police officers in Dallas was measured and sensitive, emphasizing his support for law enforcement while acknowledging the concerns of the black community. In contrast, Hillary Clinton made Dallas about “systemic racism” and the collective guilt of white people — deeply offensive in the context of an attack where white officers had been targeted, and the very opposite of what a president is supposed to do.

Three separate times — on television, on Twitter, and again via e-mail to her supporters — Clinton made stark, condescending generalizations about white people and their supposed inability to listen to black people. Continue reading at breitbart.com.

FBI Director James Comey: We Will Not Indict Hillary Clinton Even Though There is ‘Evidence’ of Violations

Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) director James Comey said Tuesday at a press conference that he will not recommend an indictment against Hillary Clinton, though he found “evidence” that she might have violated laws pertaining to the handling of classified information.

Comey announced a number of conclusions that support the findings of Breitbart News’ coverage of the Clinton private email scandal, including that she sent and received information on her private server that was classified. Comey said that 110 of Clinton’s emails were classified at the time they were sent. Continue reading at breitbart.com.

Independence Day, Rest in Peace

By Tom Tancredo

People wave flags as the Independence Day parade rolls down Main Street, Friday, July 4, 2014, in Eagar, Ariz. The Northern Arizona town celebrates the Fourth of July annually with a parade and fireworks. (AP Photo/Matt York)

People wave flags as the Independence Day parade rolls down Main Street, Friday, July 4, 2014, in Eagar, Ariz. The Northern Arizona town celebrates the Fourth of July annually with a parade and fireworks. (AP Photo/Matt York)

Why do we continue to celebrate Independence Day each July Fourth when we no longer cherish independence?

Someday soon, our progressive politicians will propose celebrating the first Monday in July as Global Interdependence Day, and no one will protest as long as it includes barbecues and fireworks.

It’s sobering to ask, who is really celebrating independence?

Our schools no longer teach our children the meaning of the Declaration of Independence.

Our elected officials no longer protect our sovereignty.

Our courts do not recognize or  even comprehend God-given “unalienable rights” for which the patriots of 1776 pledged their lives, their fortunes and their sacred honor.

Our professors, priests and “futurists” are so enamored of “global citizenship” they see individual rights as an anachronism.

Multiculturalism is not an idea to be debated, it’s the new orthodoxy to be obeyed. Or else!

And so, is it any wonder that independence has a low standing in our hierarchy of “values”?

Until very recently, our new immigrants were the ones who reminded us of our special place in world history. We are the first nation, in Thomas Jefferson’s words,  to come into being by the force of reason and not an accident of geography. The fundamental radicalism of the American founding was the idea that individual freedom is among our God-given rights, and government exists to secure those natural rights, not to trample them. Continue reading at breitbart.com.

Tom Tancredo is an American politician from Colorado, who represented the state’s sixth congressional district in the United States House of Representatives from 1999 to 2009, as a Republican. Wikipedia

Judge Jeanine Pirro Opening Statement July 2nd, 2016

On Saturday’s Justice With Judge Jeanine, Judge Pirro talks about how corrupted Loretta Lynch, crooked Hillary Clinton & impeached rapist Bill Clinton are making history for all the wrong reasons

Here is the full video and the complete transcript of her opening statement:

Breaking tonight: History for all the wrong reasons. The presumptive Democratic nominee for president grilled by the FBI. Hello and welcome to Justice. I’m Judge Jeanine Pirro. Thanks for being with us tonight. And now my opening statement:

For the first time in the history of this great nation, the person about to become the Democratic nominee for president of the United States was interrogated by the FBI today as part of an ongoing year-long federal criminal investigation. This within days of the target’s husband, Bill Clinton meeting privately on board a parked private jet with the Attorney General of the United States who has his wife’s future in her hands deciding whether that wife should be indicted for engaging in criminal activity. That Loretta Lynch, the chief law enforcement officer of this country, the head of the United States Department of Justice, that citadel of integrity and partiality would violate her own Justice Department rules on ethical conduct, specifically rule 14 would not only talk for 30 minutes in a private un-memorialized meeting.

What for a local reporter, and then not recuse herself from the criminal investigation, brings shame on all the great United States attorneys who worked tirelessly ethically doing their jobs without fear or favor. You know every small town prosecutor in this country would not only refuse to speak with the spouse of a target, but would refuse to even be in their company to avoid the appearance of impropriety. And then Loretta Lynch tries to sell us a bill of goods. And then tries to back out of her unethical conduct by saying this:

Loretta Lynch video clip: “The recommendations will be reviewed by career supervisors in the Department of Justice and the FBI and by the FBI director, uh, and then as is the common process they presented to me, and I fully expect to accept their recommendations.” (end clip)

Did you notice she said she expects to accept? Does accepting their recommendations mean she doesn’t have the right to overrule it? No, she didn’t say I will recuse myself, she didn’t say I’ll stay out of it, she didn’t say I’ll ask for a special prosecutor, I’ll ask for an independent counsel. This is all smoke and mirrors folks.

So, what’s going on in this country? We have a president who lies about everything from the peaceful protest that got out of hand in Benghazi, to: You can keep your health care and your doctor, a Secretary of State who lies about everything from that despicable video, causing the deaths of an ambassador and three Americans, to having her own server for convenience. Folks these are people for whom there are no consequences, and yet they keep going higher and higher in our government. These are people openly flaunting the system while we ordinary Americans are held to a completely different standard.

Now I’ve spent over three decades in the criminal justice system as a prosecutor, an elected judge and an elected district attorney. I have investigated, arrested, indicted, prosecuted and sentenced criminals for murders rapes and violent felonies and every one of them is entitled to the presumption of innocence. But is everyone entitled to the presumption of truthfulness? Are these people entitled to a presumption of truthfulness? The answer is absolutely not. There is no way Bill Clinton is entitled to a presumption of truthfulness. His talking to the Attorney General when he himself might be a target or at least a witness in the worldwide money laundering operation called The Clinton Foundation, parading as a not-for-profit charity would be bad enough if we have reason to believe they were saying the truth, but with Bill Clinton there can be no presumption of truthfulness.

There is serial evidence to the contrary. Bill Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice. He escaped indictment by accepting a penalty short of criminal conviction including an unequivocal admission of lying under oath by surrendering his law license. As a result he was disbarred. Hillary Clinton has been investigated for everything from the Rose law firm, to Whitewater, to cattle futures, to missing files, Travelgate, etc. So what should Americans reasonably believe? Nothing that they say. The Clintons repeatedly violate our standard of truthfulness and honesty. So should these people be trusted to run our country? Should Hillary Clinton be trusted to run for president of the United States? Should the Clintons be trusted to go back into the White House? The answer is positively, absolutely, undeniably, unquestionably No!

And that’s my open. Tell me what you think on my Facebook page or Twitter, #JudgeJeanine.

Video hat tip: freedompost.org.

#NeverTrump’s Bill Kristol Floats McCain for President, McCain’s Primary Opponent Pounces

First it was David French. Now it’s John McCain. When will Bill Kristol wake up and realize that he is irrelevant – ADB

Kristol

From Breitbart’s Big Government:

#NeverTrump leader Bill Kristol is floating a new name in his search for an establishment presidential candidate to mount an independent run to undermine presumptive Republican nominee Donald Trump: John McCain.

Kristol tweets that McCain was in DC raising money for his Senate reelection bid against his conservative primary challenger, Dr. Kelli Ward.

Continue reading at breitbart.com.

The Old Republican Guard

Reaaaaaaaallllllllllllllyyyyyyy-  So these folks helped create the Republican party, that most are dissatisfied with, and now pretend to be all pure and can’t stand what is happening the the GOP. Take a hike and don’t let the door hit you in the behind.

A number of conservatives who spent the last few decades telling Americans they should support the Republican Party — despite it fielding unconservative candidates — have suddenly decided that ideological purity matters.

For instance, columnist George Will on Friday announced his departure from the Republican Party — during an appearance at a Federalist Society luncheon no less. Will joins a number of self-proclaimed conservatives who have abandoned the GOP ship since it became clear that Trump would likely be the party’s nominee.

Click for full article-  http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/hypocrites-left-building/

Herman Cain Has A Few Words

As published by Herman Cain 6/27/16-

And RNC delegates don’t need to do the dirty work of him and others like him.

The well known conservative writer and TV commentator George Will has finally crossed the line of reason. He’s leaving the Republican Party because of Donald Trump.

It gets worse! In a recent speech, he actually hoped that Hillary would defeat Trump in the fall, which would produce gridlock in D.C.

George Will

There’s more!

George Will also said:

“Gridlock in government is a good thing nine times out of 10. Gridlock is not an American problem. It’s an American achievement.”

Gridlock often “stops things” the federal government should not be doing.

An American achievement!

Gridlock also stops things we should be doing.

Gridlock is why we have a stalled economy, a smaller military, a dysfunctional ObamaCare system, skyrocketing health care and health insurance costs, stagnant wages, rising sneak-a-taxes, and runaway regulations just to name a few.

I thought “conservatives” believed in less government, lower taxes, securing our borders, enforcing our laws and more individual responsibility. That’s how I define conservative values, and that’s consistent with the proposals Trump has made. But George Will has put all of that aside because Donald Trump does not measure every word that he speaks to Will’s liking.

Donald Trump is the presumptive Republican nominee for president, and Trump is not stuck in an ideological box like George and the rest of the anti-Trump folk, who don’t seem to know how to get out.

Oh! And let’s not forget what happens if Hillary wins, which George and other so-called vintage conservatives are OK with. There will be at least one new liberal judge appointed to the Supreme Court. Then, George Will and the other anti-Trump folk will say it’s Trump’s fault.

Bull feathers! They are the ones trying to dump Trump and sabotage his Republican nomination, which would go against the will of the people.

The latest tactic of the anti-Trump crowd is to encourage RNC delegates to “vote their conscience” and do the dirty work for these irrational ideologues. In doing so, they would be ignoring the voters they represent.

RNC delegates, I ask you: Where were these vintage conservative voices when we lost the last two presidential elections? I was not thrilled with the nominees, but I supported them and voted for them anyway, and so did you, and we lost!

Where were these vintage conservatives when you were attending monthly Republican Party meetings, going to district and state conventions, doing grassroots work for your favorite candidates, and listening to your constituents? Most of this you did on your own dime!

Where will these vintage ideological conservatives be when we lose again, because they can’t have their idea of conservative perfection? I’ll tell you where they will be. They will be writing and speaking and appearing in the media pointing fingers at Trump and others as to why we lost again.

RNC delegates, don’t do their dirty work. Represent the will of the people you represent, and you will be voting your conscience.

I’m tired of losing the presidency! I’m tired of our country drifting into more socialism and even more liberalism.

There’s no guarantee that Trump will win in November, but it does not help when these vintage, ideological, self-proclaimed vocal conservative elites continue to play into the hands of the Democrats.

RNC delegates, Donald Trump is the presumptive Republican nominee. He won!

Let’s win in November.

By Herman Cain-

View moreLoading ...